
Argh ... I'm about to enter that no-man's land between plus sized and regular sized clothing, and I haven't been there since I was an adolescent (I'm now 45) --> it's
The Land Where Nothing Fits, and it suddenly flashes me back to being 14, an age I
hated.
I'm okay for now on the bottom -- I just dropped down to size 16 jeans (from 18) at Avenue today -- but because I'm pear-shaped, I'm smaller up top and tops are a more difficult matter for me currently. 14/16s at Avenue and Lane Bryant are getting a little roomy (I have no boobs to speak of, thanks very much, though I can create a balanced illusion [when clothed] with the right bra). However, I'm pretty sure I can't fit into a regular 14 yet (I do have one regular shirt in a normal 14, but the majority of tops in that size will still be too small), and the few times I've walked into regular stores that carry larger sizes that aren't plus sizes (e.g., Ann Taylor Loft, Nordstrom), I get overwhelmed instantly. Anyway, Ann Taylor and Nordstrom are okay but a little boring, in my view, at least in terms of what they have to offer in my size. My tastes have no doubt been shaped from spending years in a film/theatre department where folks dress creatively, to put it mildly. Not to mention the Ann Taylors and Nordstroms of the world are too damn expensive for transitional clothing that's going to work for only a few months.
Inspired today by BT's account of successful shopping, I did check out Ross first (lovingly dubbed by a Czech friend as "Ross Dross for Loss" many years ago -- okay, it's funnier when she says it in her thick central European accent), but man, our local Ross is an absolute disaster: badly sorted according to size, poor quality clothing, etc. Once in a while I've found something good there, but I always have to spend a lot of time sifting through everything, and by the time I do, I'm overwhelmed and usually walk out without trying anything on.
Fortunately I'm entering this weird size zone over the summer: because I'm a college professor (for real now!) and am not teaching summer school, I can take it easy with clothes and make do with what I've got until fall without having to worry too much about looking schlubby --> it doesn't really matter. Hopefully I'll have navigated my way through No Man's Land into regular large sizes by the end of summer.
It's both fun and sort of irritating to think so much about clothing and appearance these days. Periodically I have and do, but I'm forced to think about them more than I'd like to right now because after an 80-pound loss, I'm finally beginning to get all manner of comments on my looks. It doesn't irritate me, as it might have when I was younger, nor does it make me giddy and happy (again, as it would have when I was younger); it just is a fact of life right now, and I take the remarks in whatever spirit they're generally intended. But it does make one think ...
I had coffee this morning at Starbucks while I waited for Ross to open, and I was sitting outside enjoying an iced coffee and reading my book (Bill Bryson's Neither Here nor There: Travels in Europe) when a woman in her 30s emerged from the store and elicited a few comments from a couple of middle-aged men who were sitting near by. She was attractive in a constructed kind of way: a chic short hair cut, expensively highlighted; a tall, slender body and breasts of some size, though all that was revealed through a carefully tailored (though casual) shirt and trousers. Long legs were shown off to advantage in high (though not slutty) heels, and her make-up was certainly obvious but tasteful. She looked good -- technically. But there was something a little off about her, and I realized that the men called it right when I heard one of them say (not nastily, as women might, but with good humor), "That took work!" They looked after her as she walked away, and the other guy responded, "Yeah -- that's high maintenance." They grinned when they noticed that I'd overheard them and smiled at me: "Too much trouble!" one of them said, shaking his head. "Don't you think?" the other asked me.
I shrugged, unwilling to be catty about another woman to men but also wanting to be truthful. "Well, it's not my style," I replied wryly, "but she does look good on some level, you have to admit." They shook their heads ruefully, and we went back to our own worlds.
The men had nailed it, of course: the woman looked good, but she also looked as if her appearance is where all her time and energy went, and as if there weren't any there there, to paraphrase Gertrude Stein. It doesn't mean that that's true, and it's not that she looked like a bimbo -- she was too put-together for that -- but she created an impression of effort and work, rather than an aura of attractiveness, and I'm pretty sure she was going for the latter.
Now, of course, her target audience was probably men a good 10 years younger than the ones who made the remarks, and God knows it certainly wasn't me; furthermore, 30-something men may find her hot and want to bed her or marry her or both. And let's face it, it's pretty ironic when men comment on how much work a woman may have put into her appearance because, when it's done with greater finesse, they generally haven't a clue and simply think women look that way naturally. But it was still really interesting to me to watch 1) a woman who deliberately codes herself to be looked at; 2) the way in which a couple of men "decoded" her, probably not entirely along the lines she intended.
I half-suspect that if she'd been on stage or in a magazine -- or in their beds -- even these men would have found her sexy and happily bonked her -- but somehow they found her a little de trop for real, three-dimensional life.
(It's amazing that heterosexuality ever works!)
Labels: Fashion, Head-trips
Recent Comments