Signed up for yoga
A 6-week intro course on Sunday mornings at 8 a.m. for an hour and 15 minutes, to start on April 15. Rise and shine.
We shall see.
« February 2007 | Main | April 2007 »
A 6-week intro course on Sunday mornings at 8 a.m. for an hour and 15 minutes, to start on April 15. Rise and shine.
We shall see.
The only other Native American gambling center I've been to, other than yesterday's trip to Cache Creek, is Foxwoods which I gather is the largest establishment of its kind in the country to date. Ironically, Foxwoods sits only about five miles away from an early 19th century lakeside house in Connecticut to which my family has been going since the 1920s. Fortunately, although traffic on the nearby road that goes past the house has increased, the looks of the immediate area have not changed. It caused quite a stir when the casino went up, and it is, indeed, an enormous complex -- but frankly, given the U.S.'s execrable history with respect to indigenous peoples, I find it really hard to object to tribal casinos. More power to them, I say: I hope they make a lot of money for the various tribes, and if folks like me and my family have a few issues with hoping the looks and experience of our summer homes aren't negatively impacted, well, that's understandable, but ethically it's got to be a secondary consideration.
Cache Creek was small in contrast to Foxwoods, but I liked that about it -- it was less crazy-making, frankly, than a larger environment. It's off a secondary highway, far out along a small road that winds through some beautiful farmland and some tiny, now-pretty-defunct California towns. (I may make another trip out there simply so that I can stop and check out those places a little more carefully ... I love tiny, dead towns.)
My friends and I stuck to the slot machines, and while I played more than $25 (i.e., my former high-stakes at casinos), I decided on an amount I was willing to play with before I walked through the doors, and when that was gone, I cashed out and walked away. I'm strictly small-time, though both my friends did well: one won a $4,000 jackpot, and the other won a few thousand (though overall I believe he said he was up by only a couple of hundred dollars when all was said and done).
I found the total experience of the place -- the design, the psychology of it, the people -- pretty interesting. For a while, after I'd cashed out, I simply sat with a cup of (excellent) coffee and people-watched. I'm not rich enough to be able to afford a gambling habit, but of course neither were a lot of people who were there, and that didn't stop them. Most seemed to be there for the total experience of being entertained, however; I only saw a couple of really obviously scary out-of-control folks who were upset at losing.
For most of the people I watched, the experience of winning occasionally and losing more often is simply the price of entertainment.To be honest, I found it more interesting than I'd anticipated. I'd planned on being bored (I'd brought my iPod and a book, just in case I needed to sequester myself somewhere and wait for my friends), but I wasn't.
I'd go again. Not often, but I'd go again.
Link: Cache Creek.
Uh, I'm going here tomorrow with a couple of friends who are totally into the scene. Apparently, they play, win (and, I would imagine, lose) thousands.
I'm so not a gambling kind o' gal, but they love it, so I'm going along to check it out and watch them do their thing. It is my spring break, after all.
(I've been to Las Vegas three times, I think, and as I recall, the largest amount I ever gambled was $25. In quarters. Throughout the night. Cache Creek is not going to make more than that off of me, thanks!)
Before yesterday, my most recent purchase was three somewhat tattered novels by Frances Hodgson Burnett, which I'm looking forward to receiving.
Prior to that, it was two tickets to Wicked in Chicago.
Yesterday, it was a silver, turquoise, and coral Navajo bracelet which I half-suspect will be a little too big for me, but to which I'm looking forward anyway. I don't care for turquoise alone, but I like it in combination with coral, and this is an older piece (well, relatively speaking -- probably 1940s). As such, it's a relatively good deal at $49 (+$6 S&H).
It should look nice with the coral inlaid Navajo bracelet my oldest sister gave me several years ago and which I wear daily.
I confess my taste in jewelry grows more eclectic daily. I mix gold, silver, and platinum; I like classic, somewhat understated gold necklaces and earrings, as my avatar photo clearly demonstrates, but I'll go with a mix in bracelets (and sometimes earrings, too, depending on my mood and clothing). No doubt the effect is, occasionally, loony, not to mention a tad Stella Dallas-like.
For example, on my left wrist I currently wear my 10-year old Swiss Army watch (stainless steel with gold in the band); a sterling silver Tiffany charm bracelet engraved with my initials, given to me by my husband one birthday; the aforementioned bracelet that my sister gave me; and a Medic Alert bracelet in sterling silver strung on a thin, braided red, green, yellow and black cord from Lauren's Hope. On my left hand I wear my wedding and engagement rings (platinum and diamonds).
On my right wrist I wear a bracelet of Chinese jade beads strung on cord. On that hand I wear a gold signet ring imprinted with the Driscoll family crest (my mother's maiden name).
Eclectic might be the wrong word. Insane might be better.
So I'm thinking about trying an introductory series of yoga classes (let me emphasize introductory).
Folks who do yoga swear by it, and somehow I think it would be a good thing to investigate, simply in terms of managing stress and reconnecting with a body I've never gotten to know well and that's totally changed dimensions in the last 15 months.
The key is going to be finding a place where I don't feel horribly self-conscious. I'm a klutz, I have a certain amount of arthritis, I have a hernia that's a bit tender and restricts some movement ...
But somehow I think I'm using those elements as excuses not to look into something that I'm interested in because it scares and intimidates me to do so.
It's Elaine's fault. She'd mentioned Persephone Books, its reissuing of The Shuttle by Frances Hodgson Burnett, and something about beautiful end-papers. I'm on spring break, and so, idly, I googled it.
Oh. My. God.
I covet every single title and volume they've got.
I foresee some serious spending soon.
Gulp. Tuesday, April 10. The consultation fee can be applied toward surgery, if I decide to go with this surgeon (whom my PCP recommended as one who'd worked with a lot of formerly morbidly obese people), and he performs both hernia repairs and abdominoplasties (and endless other procedures that I'm not in the market for, of course).
(Apparently he's also a hand surgeon: my PCP told me to ask him for a cortisone shot for my trigger finger, which she said is not going to get better on its own and may be aggravated by arthritis in my hands.)
I need to schedule appointments with at least a couple of more surgeons. Comparative shopping. If I hadn't hated the guy who did my friend G so much, I'd consider him: he did beautiful work but he was a serious dick, and he and I took an instant dislike to each other. That'd be a patient/doctor relationship made in hell.
(I think I'm insufficiently deferential to [and for] a lot of male doctors. The "I'm a god" approach of so many of them does not go over well with me.)
Link: Size Zero? The UK Would Prefer A Size 12.
I don't know where to begin.
Is this a press release sponsored by a weight-loss surgery company? Or is the study to which the piece refers simply sponsored by a weight-loss surgery company?
Mind you, I've had weight-surgery, so I'm not opposed to it as a final resort for controlling one's weight and health.
But I don't know that I'd trust a for-profit company that deals in weight-specific procedures to conduct such a survey. Or to interpret the results.
Finally, obviously, UK and US sizes are different. And within U.S., at least, a size whatever (pick one -- 0, 2, 14) is larger than it used to be 10, 20, 50 years ago. So, for that matter, are individual Americans. What are they really saying here?
On the face of it, the piece is all about how men and women "actually" find a larger size than anticipated attractive. Underneath the surface, however, the piece is a tribute to the tyrrany of size and sizing.
I'm hardly immune to the thrills of dropping sizes, god knows. I spent my entire adult life being clinically morbidly obese, so to fit into regular sized women's and junior-sized clothing now is, indeed, a thrill.
I'd like to think it's not term-defining as far as my self-esteem goes, however.
Okay, so I saw my PCP yesterday, and after discussing the three possible surgeries I'm considering (i.e., hernia repair, abdominoplasty, hysterectomy), we've decided to deep-six the third for the time being.
The fact is, neither my hematologist nor my PCP thinks a hysterectomy would substantially affect my anemia -- which is the result of malabsorption, not GYN-related issues.
In fact, at the moment, I have no GYN issues. There may or may not be a history of ovarian cancer in my family. At some point, if it's indicated by relatives' health, I can have some genetic testing done to see I have the markers for ovarian cancer and if I do, I can have a hysterectomy performed at that time. But as things stand now, there's no medical reason for one.
Furthermore, to do all three surgeries at once would be to put me under general anesthetic for many hours, and these days they just don't like to have to do do that. The full hysterectomy is a more serious procedure than either of the other two, it carries a greater risk of infection and other complications, and now's just not the time.
So. Good. I was feeling somewhat immobilized by having to research three different surgeries at once, as many as three different kinds of surgeons, and by the idea of trying to coordinate all of that.
Now I'll concentrate on the hernia repair and tummy tuck. The first will be covered as medically necessary, the second will have a separate surgery fee attached to it that in all likelihood won't be covered, but since it will be done at the same time, the hospitalization, anesthesia, and other fees will be.
My PCP gave me the name of a surgeon to start with who performs both the hernia repair and the tummy tuck. Of course, she's referred me to people I haven't liked at all, but it's a place to start.
Now, let's remember that I'm anemic and that I doubt seriously anyone will want to operate on me until that's brought under control. So right now I'm just in the research stage. If it can happen this summer, that would be ideal. If it can't, I'll cope. The key is to keep moving forward.
Ian McEwan: Atonement
(****)
Daniel Mendelsohn: The Lost: A Search for Six of Six Million
(*****)
Adele Geras: A Hidden Life
(****)
Louise Steinman: The Souvenir: A Daughter Discovers Her Father's War
(***)
Shaun Tan: Arrival
(*****)
Sebastian Faulks: Engleby
(****)
Anne Perry: The Face of a Stranger : A Victorian Mystery
(**)
Emilie Carles: A Life of Her Own: The Transformation of a Countrywoman in 20th-Century France
(****)
Anne Brontë: Agnes Grey
(***)
Charlotte Bronte: Villette
(****)
Elizabeth Enright: Spiderweb for Two: A Melendy Maze
(*****)
Harry Bernstein: The Invisible Wall: A Love Story That Broke Barriers
(***)
Frances Hodgson Burnett: The Head of the House of Coombe
(***)
Recent Comments